Showing posts with label self. Show all posts
Showing posts with label self. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

our bodies, ourselves

Seeing real people's bodies is the best antidote to the culturally-inscribed feelings of self-consciousness and inferiority that many of us have spent our whole lives feeling. It might sound like weird advice, but seeing your friends naked is really good for you. Since you already love them, you are not judgmental about the way that their bodies look because their bodies are the physical manifestation of the people that reside inside the bodies. And it helps you realize that your body is the same way. I've lately been consumed with love and affection for my own body--not because I have big round boobs or a flat stomach (see Fig. A.) because I have neither of these. Instead, I've become less concerned with the way it looks from the imaginary observer's standpoint (into which I'd formerly constantly placed myself) and more concerned with the way it works and the way that it feels from the inside. My boobs are important and wonderful because I get pleasure from them. My stomach is wonderful and important because it digests the food that I eat and it strengthens and clenches from laughter, not sit ups. If my body does so much for me - from keeping my heart beating, to moving my legs so I can get around, to effortlessly forming on my lips the words that I want to speak - how could I be so ungrateful as to wish it were different?


Fig. A. 50% insane discipline and repression of appetite, 50% photoshop
Nobody that I know actually looks like this, and I probably won't meet anybody who does.

Fig. B. Much closer to the way that I look and the way that the people I know look. She's not dieting or obsessively working out but she's obviously living the life. She's also more womanly than Fig. A. who looks more like a teenage Barbie.
(P.S., who is the girl puking in the background?)

so dance around your house naked even if the neighbors see you over the fence. Fuck it.

Sunday, January 1, 2012

year in review and preview

accomplishments of 2011:
- academic performance/development, including completing grad schools apps!
- serious growth as an activist/organizer/leader from TDS presidency. Efficacy at making things happen. Passed the torches to capable and passionate underclassmen
- one year at the Writing Center, greatest job ever
- one year at the Great Place, with the Greatest roommates on god's green earth and the Greatest theme parties n. philadelphia has ever seen
- the year of lipstick! and more lipstick to 2012!
- dates with boys! advancement from hook up scene to dating scene, including the courage to instigate and ask for clarification when unclear
- spreading feminism and radically compassionate politics to friends and family members of all stripes
- legal drinking!
- participation in a historic social movement and collective action for the causes that move and motivate me
WE DID IT 2011

plans and aspirations for 2012:
- choose the right graduate school where I can grow and be challenged and learn, in a location that I will come to love and call home
- continue to refine the as-yet nebulous collection of moral/ethical precepts to better delineate a spirituality that is intellectually defensible and which moves me to greater compassion
- be able to weather the existential anxiety that is sure to ensue from the post-college transition; skillfully sustain relationships with those I love who may be further away
- maintain unwavering belief in my own self and abilities even when faced with the challenges that 2012, graduation, moving, and grad school are sure to bring
- more dates while keeping them properly weighted as not paramount to my own worth or happiness
- love more recklessly. Take emotional risks for the opportunity of growth/experience. Be more authentic with myself and with those I love
- have the fortitude and patience that are necessary for the sustaining energy of social change
- piss away less time on teh Internet

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Naomi Wolf on love and beauty

(got this book for christmas and i still love it as much on the reread)

But we long to be loved the way we were, if we were lucky, as children: every toe touched, each limb exclaimed upon because it was ours alone, incomparable. ... [Yet,] Those elements that make each woman unique--the unrepeatable irregularity of her face, the scars of a childhood trauma, the lines and furrows from a life of thought and laughter, grief and rage--exclude her from the ranks of mythical beauties, and from the charmed playgrounds, we are told, of love.
...
Women understand that there are two distinct economies: There is physical attraction, and there is the "ideal." When a woman looks at a man, she can physically dislike the idea of his height, his coloring, his shape. But after she has liked him and loved him, she would not want him to look any other way: For many women, the body appears to grow beautiful and erotic as they grow to like the person in it. The actual body, the smell, the feel, the voice and movement, become charged with heat through the desirable person who animates it. ... The way in which women regard men's bodies is proof that one can look at a person sexually without reducing him or her to pieces.
...
"Beauty" is only visual, more real on film or in stone than in three living dimensions. ... So humans, in order to become dependable, sexually insecure consumers, had to be trained away from these other, more sensual senses. One needs distance, even in the bedroom, to get a really good look; other senses are more intoxicating close up.
The shape and weight and texture and feel of bodies is crucial to pleasure but the appealing body will not be identical. The Iron Maiden is mass-produced. The world of attraction grows blander and colder as everyone, first women and soon men, begin to look alike. People lose one another as more masks are assumed. Cues are missed.
Sadly, the signals that allow men and women to find the partners who most please them are scrambled by the sexual insecurity initiated by beauty thinking. A woman who is self-conscious can't relax to let her sensuality come into play. If she is hungry, she will be tense. If she is "done up" she will be on the alert for her reflection in his eyes. If she is ashamed of her body, its movements will be stilled. If she does not feel entitled to claim attention, she will not demand the airspace to shine in. If his field of vision has been blocked in by "beauty"--a box continually shrinking--he simply will not see her, his real love, standing right before him.
CHRISTIAN LACROIX GIVES WOMEN BACK THEIR FEMININITY, reads the fashion headline. "Femininity" is code for femaleness plus whatever a society happens to be selling. If "femininity" means female sexuality and its loveliness, women never lost it and do not need to buy it back. Wherever we feel pleasure, all women have "good" bodies. We do not have to spend money and go hungry and struggle and study to become sensual; we always were. We need not believe we must somehow earn good erotic care; we always deserved it.
Femaleness and its sexuality are beautiful. Women have long secretly suspected as much. In that sexuality, women are physically beautiful already; superb; breathtaking.
Many, many men see it this way too. A man who wants to define himself as a real lover of women admires what shows of her past on a woman's face, before she ever saw him, and the adventures and stresses that her body has undergone, the scars of trauma, the changes of childbirth, her distinguishing characteristics, the light in her expression. The number of men who already see in this way is far greater than the arbiters of mass culture would lead us to believe...
The fact is that the myth's version of sexuality is by definition just not true: Most men who are at this moment being aroused by women, flirting with them, having crushes on them, or making love to them, are doing so to women who look exactly like who they are.
-Naomi Wolf, "The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty are Used Against Women" (New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc., 1991), 172-178.